In short. The visits, the months of no visible change and the long wait before the result can be judged. What the plan asks of a patient, described without quoting money.

Key points

  • Not in money, which belongs in the consultation.
  • Ask how many sessions, across how many months, when the review happens, and at what point the result can honestly be judged.
  • A practice that answers in months has thought about the decision rather than about the appointment.

The question patients bring is what it costs, and the honest answer is that the appointment is the smallest part of it. What a course of this substance asks for is a sequence of visits across months, a stretch in which nothing is visible, and a verdict that cannot be reached early however carefully the area is watched.

The visits

Sessions usually run across three to six months, with the spacing deliberately wider than convenience would suggest, because the tissue needs time to respond before more is added. Inside that period sits the review, where the tissue is examined for firm areas as well as for effect. After the course is completed the effect keeps building, so the appointments do not end when the injections do.

The flat weeks

From around the second week to the sixth, the treated area may look exactly as it did before. That period is where most of the patience is spent and where most courses are abandoned, and it cannot be shortened by anything the patient does. It is not a side effect to be endured; it is the shape of the treatment, and a plan that describes it in weeks rather than in encouragement is a plan that has been thought about.

Ask what the plan costs in months

Not in money, which belongs in the consultation. Ask how many sessions, across how many months, when the review happens, and at what point the result can honestly be judged. A practice that answers in months has thought about the decision rather than about the appointment.

The wait for a verdict

Because the effect develops after the last session, and because firmness and unevenness are most likely to appear in the same window, the period between six and twelve months is both the point of judgement and the period of most uncertainty. A patient who wants an answer at three months will not get one, and a patient who spends those months looking for one will find the course considerably worse than it needs to be.

Costs that appear on no price list

  • Several weeks in which the treated area looks no different, with nothing that can speed it up.
  • A result that cannot be judged early and cannot be reversed once it is judged.
  • Further visits if a firm area needs assessment or management months later.

The useful way to frame it is that this is not a purchase but a commitment with a shape: a small number of sessions, a year of development, and a decision that cannot be revisited once the material is in. A patient comfortable with that shape, who has asked how long the plan runs, will usually be content. A patient comparing appointments on price alone has been sold the smallest part of the decision.

Related reading

Frequently asked questions

How long is the whole commitment from the first session to a verdict?

Sessions usually run across three to six months, and the result can honestly be judged between six and twelve months. The commitment is measured in more than a year rather than in a course of appointments, and the effect continues to develop through most of it.

Is the waiting really the hardest part?

Patients report that it is. The injections are minutes and the tenderness settles in days, but the weeks in which the treated area looks unchanged are what most people find difficult, because there is no evidence to hold on to and the decision to continue feels like a decision made blind.

Can anything shorten the wait?

No. The response is biological and takes the time it takes, and adding sessions before the tissue has finished responding produces unevenness rather than a faster result, with nothing available to dissolve it. Patience is not a virtue here so much as the only option that works.

Risks & Limitations

  • Irreversibility: there is no agent that reverses this substance. An uneven or unwanted result is managed over time, with injected treatment, or occasionally by removal, and never switched off.
  • Nodules and granulomas — firm lumps or an inflammatory reaction that can appear weeks or months after treatment, most often in the window when the result is being judged.
  • Unevenness or over-correction, which is harder to correct than under-treatment in an area that cannot be dissolved.
  • Nothing is visible on the day and the treated area may look unchanged for several weeks. This is expected rather than a sign the treatment has failed.
  • Infection or inflammation at an injection site, which needs prompt assessment rather than waiting.
  • Tenderness, swelling, occasional bruising and occasional headache after treatment.
  • The result develops over months, cannot be judged before six months, is not permanent, and declines gradually after its fullest point; the face continues to age.

When to Seek Care

  • A firm, growing or painful lump at or near an injection site, appearing weeks or months after treatment — this needs assessment even when it is not painful.
  • Redness, warmth, swelling or pus at an injection site, or fever.
  • Skin breakdown, blistering, or a dusky or mottled patch over a treated area — seek care immediately.
  • Increasing pain, or pain out of proportion to the injection.
  • Difficulty breathing, facial swelling or a widespread rash — possible severe reaction; seek emergency care immediately.

References & Further Reading

  • American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) — injectable and skin safety information
  • American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) — injectable treatment guidance
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) — approved injectable products and safety communications
  • National Medical Products Administration (NMPA, China) — approved product status
  • Chongqing West District Hospital — Plastic Surgery & Aesthetics Medical Center

Medically reviewed by Ke He, MD (何锞), Deputy Director & Head of Skin & Laser Aesthetics. Last reviewed: 19 September 2026.

This page is patient education, not medical advice, and it does not cite individual studies. Discuss your own case with a qualified clinician. To arrange an assessment at Chongqing West District Hospital, see Contact & Consultation.